new poly real

 new pol more

The left-wing/right-wing distinction is already historically-contingent, originating in the late 18th century French National Assembly between supporters of the ancien regime on the right and revolutionaries on the left. The ancien regime, of course, no longer exists as a political entity. The left/right distinction continues are useful shorthand for shifting political affiliations but, originally, it's just an arbitrary distinction based on the relative seating arrangement of French representatives.

So, sure, there could be a possible universe in which the revolutionaries sat on the right wing of the National Assembly, and probably no need to have different laws of nature. I'm not sure, with different laws of nature, life would even be possible. Like, if hot air didn't rise, the Earth would be too hot to support life. If gravity did not pull mass together, there wouldn't be stars or planets. The historically-contingent political language that we use, I think, would be far down the list of things that would changed if the laws of nature were different.

What if life didn’t developed regardless of the radical effects of said changes in the rules of nature. Wouldn’t it be so radically different that whatever said universe has as humans develops radically different methods of thought.

[…] is there a philosophy or political theory that says that by using that other universes's unique laws of nature's political positions on our political topics , those other universes's different laws of nature political positions on our political topics would be as opposite of a left/right political stance on said topic as the left wing and right wing are opposite of each other?

Not that I'm aware of. Which means probably not in contemporary academic political theory.