no to purple washing,westernization (work in progress)

when you hear liberal western outlets celebrating Saudi becoming liberalized and westernized by so called 'milestones ' like military and child marriage laws being westernized it is sick and disgusting site to behold

I will not allow Saudi Arabia to become woke, to have same sex marriage or trans surgery for under 18 legal or even for anyone, I will not allow them to have pro trans laws or to allow LGBTQ or trans into military

force Saudi Arabia to avoid being easy on crime like NYC under Alvin Bragg, force them to have Deep South bail laws

https://socialistproject.ca/2021/04/imperialist-origins-of-saudi-arabia/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_United_Nations#:~:text=The%20United%20Nations%20has%20been,enforce%20rulings%2C%20and%20ideological%20bias.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilizing_mission#Modern_day (as of May 18 2024 1128pm ET)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Marriageable_age&diff=prev&oldid=1080580803

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_minimum_driving_ages#Asia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_age_in_the_United_States#Underage_marriage

white man's burden to civilize so called third world countries

against Saudis being spoiled like Elaina in May 2024 Jordan matter vid and YouTuber girl Muslim

force Saudi Arabia to lower minimum age for marriage to 15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postcolonial_feminism#Relationship_to_Third_World_feminism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femonationalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_Protection_Units

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_capitalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postfeminism

https://lifeactvs.blogspot.com/2022/12/my-details-4pt.html

https://ffithblogsectktionn.blogspot.com/2023/03/4pt-sinslfdfi.html

https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/42gyjc/feminist_opinions_on_lower_requirements_for_women/

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Postcolonial_feminism&oldid=1221396288

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Imperial_feminism&oldid=1177391550

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purplewashing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femonationalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homonationalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_feminism#Criticism (mixed view mostly good view on it me)

I support Ayotella's stated feminist goals in 1979

to force saudi military to be like Peru communist ones, rojava YPJ or not allow women front lines military

banning 15 to 17 year old free consenting teens w parental permission from getting married is as restrictive, authoritarian and wrong as doing so to same sex couples , marriage equality means marriage equality

Bloomberg https://sponsored.bloomberg.com/article/sc/globalisation-isn-t-dead-it-needs-a-reset admitting globalism sucks

Populism studies admits populists correct, by wanting a 'new type of democracy to be able to fix democracy's problems)

kids in US already sexualized (drag queens, LGBTQ school propaganda, allowed to get sex changes too easily and too young etc)

moral relativism/4pt /multipolar

morality is a human construct

CAFTA: A Topic for Women

Human Rights Watch

https://www.hrw.org › news › 2004/06/13 › cafta-topic-...

Jun 13, 2004 — It is not necessary to be an anti-globalization activist to worry about the trade negotiations between Peru and the United States.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-05-13/where-the-american-left-went-wrong

https://sponsored.bloomberg.com/article/sc/globalisation-isn-t-dead-it-needs-a-reset

The way that we can get out of this epistemological field of Western political modernity is , for us to focus on the name Western political modernity, we have already found a solution. As to get out of these boundaries, we need to go beyond the West.

So, we can find solutions in and help from the East, non-Western civilizations, Islam, India, Africa, great ancient Chinese civilization, off the grid/Technoprimitive and less modern persons. All of these civilization forms could be our example to follow.

We should consider the Western history as just one branch of the history of humanity.

If we reject the pretensions of Westerners' universalism, we might rediscover the values of political ideas/thought from China and Islam , Christian Eastern Orthodox (Eastern, not Western, since Christian Western Orthodox is a completely different form of political thought).

We might rediscover Indian tradition, or off the grid/Technoprimitive and less modern principles.... not judging them from the point of view of progress or technological development.

All forms of people , living in all society types, are all human — maybe they are more human than our technological civilization.

We should rediscover the multiplicity of all types of cultures and societies, and we should accept them.

Accept off the grid /Technoprimitivism and less modern people, societies and tribes that are living beyond the so-called "civilization" as an example to follow, and possibly, to discover and study. This could be something that we have to first understand, not to judge or bring to the criteria of Western political modernity.

We are rediscovering every type of civilization outside of the West. There is an immense amount of political, cultural thought, philosophy, religion outside of the West. So we can take them as a model on how to create something new. We can propose some non-Western thing and take that as a guiding star for the 4th Political Theory

It is obvious that we can’t reach some new type of universalism; we shouldn't, and don't need that. We must open the perspectives for each civilization and culture to create their own political future, separate from something inevitably imposed as a destiny by the colonial Western modernity.

This invitation is geographical. We must recognize the value of political thought outside of the West.

For instance, Russian Eurasianists claim that Austrian philosopher Kelsen's universal history of law study is wholly dedicated to Roman law. Only a few pages of it are dedicated to all of the other non-Western legal systems.

That isn’t to say that Roman law is evil. There are non-Roman law systems that exist outside of Western civilization, and that is fine. We have Islamic law, Indian law , Chinese law, the Confucianist tradition,, besides some less modern legality and legitimacy systems of. We would better served to consider them all.

Every civilization could be inspired by their own political thought. That is the concept of the 4th Political Theory. After the end of Liberalism 2.0 which we are heading toward, we have to rehabilitate non-Western political systems.

These political systems might seem terrible, uncivil and awful to Westerners . However that is not an argument. Westerners need to worry about their own civilization, which is only one kind of civilization among a lot of other civilizations.

Moreover nobody can judge the others. Nobody, whether it is George Soros, the Koch brothers, Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton, Washington DC, Brussels, Moscow Russia, Riyadh, New Delhi, Beijing etc. Nobody can judge the other. There is no universal criterion in political thought, and that is the main principle of the 4th Political Theory.

The 4pt is the liberty to fight for social justice, the liberty to be patriotic, and the liberty to defend the State, Church, people and family, along with the liberty to remain human or to become something else.

Liberty is not on their side any longer. Liberalism 2.0 is the enemy of all liberty. So, let’s not lose sight of this value. It’s a most very good value, since it is the essence of the soul of humanity and the human heart. Liberty opens us up to God’s way, to sacrality, and to love.

So for starters, we need to overcome and beat Liberalism 2.0.

We must bring this lasting decay to the end, and to finish with Liberalism 2.0 (with open society, with all the products of our Liberal 2.0 NGO and donor style liberal system based on individualism, materialism, cultural radicalism/post liberal progressivism on the full alienation of the people and extinction of social links and using a human rights system consistent with my human rights views in this blog as human rights models

The main idea of fighting Liberalism 2.0 is to fight all Western political modernity. That is our opponent. The 4th Political Theory invites everyone to fight. However, we are not fighting against the West. The West is not an enemy.

We are not fighting against modernity or say the contemporary state of affairs in some societies.

This is because we have different societies, different civilizations that each exist in our modern world and don't belong to the Western modernity. We can actually live in the modern world outside of Western political modernity.

We should not use past alternatives like Communism or Fascism to defeat Liberalism 2.0. We should not fall into those traps

We need to imagine something radically different than those ideologies to defeat Liberalism 2.0, not only from Liberalism, but from the Western political modernity taken altogether. This is what the 4th Political Theory is all about.

Individualism is the last step of liberalism, thus we should finish with the concept of individualism.

The New class is ineffective , counter productive and a waste. It closes in on itself causing public hostility at the elite.

Liberalism 2.0 is wrong also because it downplays or doesn’t employ changing things from within (other than with the CRT antiracism federal board which I support and liquid democracy) Anarchism , changing things from within, saviorism (some) and Paternalism/Libertarian Paternalism and even complete social justice "epistemology" designed on purpose to get around the mainstream and usual modes of argumentation and mutual criticism (to an extent) are five great methods for positive radical change.

Skip to main contentTurn off continuous scrolling

Accessibility help

Accessibility feedback

Google

"lower the driving age"

All

Images

Videos

News

Forums

Tools

SafeSearch

AI Overview

Learn more

…

A petition has been launched to lower the legal driving age to 13 years old, with the goal of getting the government to respond if the petition reaches 10,000 signatures. The petition was launched by Yusuf Marcu, who argues that teenagers are more trustworthy to drive.

GB News

Driving age limits could be slashed to just 13 as petition gains support

Mar 8, 2024 — A petition has been launched to lower the legal driving age limit to 13 years old as teenagers are reportedly more trustworthy to drive a vehicle. The petition, launched by Yusuf Marcu, has already received nearly 4,000 signatures and if it reaches 10,000 it will prompt a response by the Government.

Some say that lowering the driving age could have the following benefits:

Teens can get to school by themselves instead of relying on their parents or the bus

This could make teens feel more independent

Parents will have more time

Teens can go on dates without having to be driven by a guardian

However, others oppose lowering the driving age due to concerns that:

Younger drivers are more likely to be distracted

Young drivers have a higher accident rate

Teens are not able to correctly analyze dangerous situations

In the United States, the age at which a person can legally get a driver's license depends on the state. In some states, a learner's permit can be obtained at 15, and a license at 16. In other states, a full driver's license may not be available until 18. Alaska and Arkansas have the lowest minimum driving age, allowing people to start driving at 14 years old.

Generative AI is experimental.

Should the Driving Age for Truckers Be Lowered?

Next Exit Logistics

https://nextexitlogistics.com › should-the-driving-age-f...

... lower the driving age or reduce the already low standard to get a CDL,” Spencer told a subcommittee. “This is really a highway safety issue. What's not a ...

Search This Blog

futurist blog lis

no to purple washing,westernization (work in progress)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

eioewioew0we9we99we0ew0

more pollticici

pofd09f0jodfjododododo